|
Customer Testimonials
I live in an area saturated with Illegal Aliens. I've heard of horror stories where teens would apply for college student loans only to be turned down for 'defaulting on their five mortgages'. It turned out Illegal Aliens were using their SSN's. Thank you CheckMySSN.com for putting my fears to rest that My Teens' SSN's haven't been tampered with! Also, every parent should know their SSN rights - you do not have to give out your child's SSN to a doctor's office, school, etc. Go to the SS website and see who is authorized to take your SSN. It's your right not to give it out. The less people that have that number the better. Tori T. - Holtsville, L.I., NY Frequenty Asked Questions
Where does this information come from?
Do I have to Create an Account? Is the CheckMySSN.com site secure? What is CheckMySSN.com? Is my identity at risk if I use CheckMySSN.com? Is my Social Security Number at risk if I use CheckMySSN.com? What do I do if I don't recognize the information on my report? Is it important to Check My SSN frequently? Can I check my child's Social Security Number? Can Employers use CheckMySSN.com? Is there a Support Staff I can talk to should I have questions? How often is this information updated? Does this product lock down or impact my credit report or score? How do I cancel my account, if I start one? Who's stalking your SSN?
Is someone using your SSN?
Don't Know? Find Out! ![]() Keep the criminals out of your life. | Identity Theft in the NewsRecord Number of Data Breaches in 2007By Mark Jewellap - AP Associated Press BOSTON - The loss or theft of personal data such as credit card and Social Security numbers soared to unprecedented levels in 2007, and the trend isn't expected to turn around anytime soon as hackers stay a step ahead of security and laptops disappear with sensitive information. And while companies, government agencies, schools and other institutions are spending more to protect ever-increasing volumes of data with more sophisticated firewalls and encryption, the investment often is too little too late. "More of them are experiencing data breaches, and they’re responding to them in a reactive way, rather than proactively looking at the company's security and seeing where the holes might be,'' said Linda Foley, who founded the San Diego-based Identity Theft Resource Center after becoming an identity theft victim herself. Foley's group lists more than 79 million records reported compromised in the United States through Dec. 18. That's a nearly fourfold increase from the nearly 20 million records reported in all of 2006. Another group, Attrition.org, estimates more than 162 million records compromised through Dec. 21 — both in the U.S. and overseas, unlike the other group's U.S.-only list. Attrition reported 49 million last year. "It's just the nature of business, that moving forward, more companies are going to have more records, so there will be more records compromised each year,'' said Attrition's Brian Martin. "I imagine the total records compromised will steadily climb.'' But the biggest difference between the groups' record-loss counts is Attrition.org's estimate that 94 million records were exposed in a theft of credit card data at TJX Cos., the owner of discount stores including T.J. Maxx and Marshalls. The TJX breach accounts for more than half the total records reported lost this year on both groups' lists. The Identity Theft Resource Center counts about 46 million — the number of records TJX acknowledged in March were potentially compromised. Attrition's figure is based on estimates from Visa and MasterCard officials who were deposed in a lawsuit banks filed against TJX. TJX has said that before the breach, which was revealed in January, it invested "millions of dollars on computer security, and believes our security was comparable to many major retailers.'' With wireless data transmission more common, hackers increasingly are expected to target what many experts see as a major vulnerability. Eavesdroppers appear to be learning how to bypass security safeguards faster than ever, said Jay Tumas, the head of Harvard University's network operations, at a recent conference for information security professionals. "Within a year or two, these folks are catching up,'' Tumas said. The two nonprofit groups' 2007 data also show rising numbers of incidents in which employees lose sensitive data, as opposed to cases of hacking. Besides TJX's problem, major 2007 breaches include lost data disks with bank account numbers in Britain, a hacker attack of a U.S.-based online broker's database and a con that spilled resume contact information from a U.S. online jobs site. "A lot of breaches are due to inadequate information handling, such as laptop computers with Social Security numbers on them that are lost,'' Foley said. "This is human error, and something that’s completely avoidable, as opposed to a hacker breaking into your computer system.'' Attrition.org and the Identity Theft Resource Center are the only groups, government included, maintaining databases on breaches and trends each year. They've been keeping track for only a handful of years, with varied and still-evolving methods of learning about breaches and estimating how many people were affected. Despite those challenges, the two nonprofits say it's clear 2007 will end up a record year for the amount of information compromised, because of greater data loss and increased reporting of breaches. Both groups acknowledge many breaches may be missing from their lists, because they largely count incidents reported in news media that they consider credible. Media coverage has risen in part because of the growing number of states requiring businesses and institutions to publicly disclose data losses. Thirty-seven states, plus Washington D.C., now have such requirements. Because of proliferation of such laws, "it may take a year or two before things stabilize and we can see what's really happening,'' Foley said. "If that's the case, then we'll know whether businesses are practicing better information-handling techniques.'' Both groups acknowledge many breaches may be missing from their lists, because they largely count incidents reported in news media that they consider credible. Media coverage has risen in part because of the growing number of states requiring businesses and institutions to publicly disclose data losses. Thirty-seven states, plus Washington D.C., now have such requirements. Because of proliferation of such laws, "it may take a year or two before things stabilize and we can see what's really happening,'' Foley said. "If that's the case, then we'll know whether businesses are practicing better information-handling techniques.'' |






